I have written previously about all the reasons I believe
allowing clones in the registry is wrong; if you’d like to read that, clickhere.
If no one wants clones, then how did we get here? Money!
It costs an incredible amount to get a cloned foal on the ground, and
only in a case where a person stands to make a ton of money is an individual
cloned. Dr. Veneklasen, who has set up an equine reproductive clinic in Texas to do clones, is at the center of the lawsuit – I can bet that his
biggest motivator is NOT that he is trying to further the breed, but is instead
thinking about how much money he will make once registration legitimizes his
practices. It is, after all, a breach of anti-trust lawsuit. But what impact will this have on the
breed? What will the 20, 30, 50 year
affect be of breeding the same individual horse (or small group of horses), over and over and over? How will we be able to track those clones
when line breeding starts to occur? How will this affect genetic disorders, both the ones that we know of now, and those that have yet to emerge? Once we go down this road, we will not be able to turn back. What might seem like a small rule change will have lasting detrimental effects that we can't even begin to understand right now.I am horrified at the thought of going to a competition, and witnessing clones competing against each other. How about many multiples of clones competing against each other? Now, wouldn’t that be fun? We already see the same bloodlines endlessly crossed on each other in the show pen – next, it will be literally the same horse over and over. Raise your hand if you think this would be a HUGE turn off, for members and for people outside the business that we might want to draw in. Cloning will remove the glorious ART of breeding, the ability of the studious breeder to blend bloodlines, assess strengths and conformation, taking chances on outcrosses that might produce the next Great One. Cloning reduces it to creating widgets. The next widget is just like the one before it. "'Cause that widget made us lots of money!"
I have seen people write that cloning is like a bloodline
that you don’t like; if you don’t like it, you don’t buy it or breed it. So, if we just ignore it, it will go
away? Oh my, how I wish this were
true! While I do agree that we all
should make a conscious decision NOT to feed the cloning beasts in any way, I
must disagree that by simply not buying those horses, or breeding to them, that
we are doing our best to safeguard the integrity of the breed. It is the conscientious breeder's responsibility to protect the breed's integrity. In the same way that it is a knowledgeable observer's duty to step up and do something when they see someone beating their horse behind a barn at a show, it is the astute breeder's duty to step up for the breed in the case of clones, and do what they can to block their being legitimized. There will always be people who aspire to be
a big shot, there will always be people who are only in horses to make a buck,
there will always be people who want the newest, latest toy but don’t think
twice about discarding it later. We
cannot allow those people to make decisions that will severely impact those of
us that breed for a better horse tomorrow (instead of horses that are long
dead) and want to be here for the long haul. We have too much to lose.
Excellent horse breeding requires a long view, and the long view of
clones is one of suspended animation and a shrinking gene pool.
I am against giving clones papers of any kind. I know there are people with the theory that
by giving clones papers, even in some sort of appendix, we will be able to somehow control the clone
producers, and keep them honest. If a
person is of a mind to be dishonest, and, say, switch a clone’s semen for semen
from an animal that is the ‘real thing,’ a piece of paper isn’t going to stop
them. Won’t the real thing always be more valuable,
and therefore, more profitable than that from a clone, even a clone with
papers? I’d love to think that people
would do the honorable thing, but the problem is, I have met too many people in
the horse business that would sell their granny up the river if it made them
some money! The point is, once cloning starts happening on a larger scale, and
is given more legitimacy by allowing registration, we are going to see the cost
of producing clones drop, we are going to see more people doing it, and we are
going to see more people doing shady things around it. From what I have heard, it has already
started to happen! This genie is already
out of the lamp!
I am of the opinion that allowing the registration of clones will hurt our industry at a time when participation is already starting to wane. Many people are leaving reining and cutting because it seems that an elite few in high places pull the strings, and the cloning case only furthers that perception. We are sacrificing the long term goals and success of everyone involved for the short term gain of a few well-connected individuals. Allowing clones in any capacity is shooting ourselves in the foot.
But don’t think that cloning is just an AQHA problem. If those who stand to gain from producing
clones can force their way in to a member-driven association like AQHA, they
surely can do it to other registries. I am hoping that AQHA continues to fight and that the case is heard by a judge that is familiar with breeding animals. This is a precedent that affects all horsemen. May we all thank Judge Mary Lou Robinson for her ability, with the stroke of a pen, to put the horses of the world, and the traditions the make up horse breeding, at risk for a downfall.In a recent conversation with another breeder, a metaphor came to me…..that of the difference between mass-produced plastic spoons, and heirloom silver, hand-engraved, spoons. Which would you rather eat off of? Which would you rather keep for your kids to use? Horses that we have bred up to this point, that are a unique combination of sire and dam, whose bloodlines have been carefully developed and crossed , that may be from the only time a mare and stallion were crossed because soon thereafter, one of them died – those horses are the heirloom silver spoons. The unique, wonderful gift that we can offer future generations of horsemen which will always be useful, and whose value rests on integrity of lineage. The clones are the plastic spoons; sure, you might be able to eat off one, but it looks like every other spoon, it isn’t as good as the original, and because there are so many just like it, it isn’t worth that much to the next generation. The only person happy about the plastic spoon is the guy who owns the plastic spoon factory. The rest of us are just witnesses to the end of an era.